Substrate × Operational × Interaction — Three Apertures of Deterministic Infrastructure
How the Universe Hangs Together — Linguistic Topology
Everything in Roxy can be seen through three stable apertures:
The laws of the Roxy universe — not services, not components, but the axioms everything obeys.
Not laws, not systems, but forces that shape behavior. Always present, never directly "called."
The engines of the substrate with state, invariants, and conservation laws. The only substrate elements that are full systems.
Not a primitive, field, or system. The entity that all substrate laws constrain.
Roxy-Identity is:
It is what CRUDEIBL, HEDRIBL, ORCHARD, DECIDIR, STRATA, Accord, Harmonics, ChronoLedger, and Witness all bind.
How the pieces relate vertically:
Each layer inherits constraints from below and exposes guarantees to above.
Different conversations live in different parts of the taxonomy:
| Audience | Primary Locus | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Founders / Substrate Engineers | Primitives, Fields, Engines, Identity | Deep substrate truth |
| SRE / Ops / Infra | Operational Systems | Substrate as explanation for reliability |
| BD / Strategy / Partners | Interaction Surfaces & Products | Substrate as deep thesis |
| New Product Design | All layers (vertical integration) | Primitives → Engines → Products → Operations → Interactions |
How to read the taxonomy precisely:
When you say "CRUDEIBL" without qualifier, you mean the law. When you say "CRUDEIBL-backed unit," you mean the product.
Accord and Harmonics never become standalone products. If you can point to a UI or API, it's something shaped by them, not them directly.
ChronoLedger and Witness are never "just features." Features are projections of these engines into product space.
The same entity appears different through each aperture. This is structural, not subjective. Use the right aperture for the conversation.